<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Manchester SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk</link>
	<description>This website has been brought to you by the letters S, E and O</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 15:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 30 for Manchester SEO with no backlinks by Manchester SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/top-30-manchester-seo-no-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 15:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/?p=108#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Any thoughts?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What&#039;s the quickest route to spamville by car avoiding motorways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Any thoughts?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What&#8217;s the quickest route to spamville by car avoiding motorways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 30 for Manchester SEO with no backlinks by Sat nav</title>
		<link>http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/top-30-manchester-seo-no-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Sat nav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/?p=108#comment-275</guid>
		<description>In experience, I believe you should always start with good keyword desities, titles and descriptions, semantics and clean code, then for most search terms worth targeting varied backlinks are necessary.

Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In experience, I believe you should always start with good keyword desities, titles and descriptions, semantics and clean code, then for most search terms worth targeting varied backlinks are necessary.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 30 for Manchester SEO with no backlinks by Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/top-30-manchester-seo-no-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/?p=108#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Hi Martin,

&lt;blockquote&gt;“Back Links are not as important as everyone makes out” 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The above statment refers to views such as this:

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;a website cannot be found by Google without a link&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;a website will not be indexed by Google unless there is a backlink&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;a website cannot achieve any sort of decent rank without a backlink&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

I had noticed that the necessity of a backlink may no longer be the case and wanted see how far simply &#039;telling google about the website&#039; and adding content would get it. Check out the posts leading up to this one as I logged as much as I felt was necessary.

&lt;blockquote&gt;what was the competition like when you had #30 page ranks etc?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The last time I had checked &#039;competition&#039; (only as far as pages that contain the phrase) was 26th January. See http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/competition-for-manchester-seo/
Manchester SEO is not very competitive as a converting term IMO and it&#039;s very much a vanity rank but when you manually look through the SERPs there are a large number of websites and blogs that are &#039;optimised&#039; for the phrase (more than 30 at a guess). 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Appreciate any feedback because my views are content and back links are king.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If I had to choose I would say content is King purely because I have found that websites can be indexed and appear without backlinks purely based on the content. When it comes to SERP visibility the need for backlinks as an ongoing provision or as a &#039;starter boost&#039; may not be necessary for a good many websites with niche markets from sole traders to SMEs and even strong brands. A Google local (ahem sorry &lt;em&gt;Google Places&lt;/em&gt; - why did they change that?)listing and a simple website (with the right content) could be all a business needs to get &lt;em&gt;what they want&lt;/em&gt; from that website.

I&#039;m not saying backlinks are not important, just that there are other factors that come into it and that you don&#039;t need a backlink for Google to &#039;find&#039; and &#039;index&#039; a website anymore. Clearly it&#039;s not something that can be confirmed by doing an analysis today since there are a couple of backlinks present so the reader is encouraged to use what I&#039;ve recorded as something to consider and explore further themselves. It does require patience though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin,</p>
<blockquote><p>“Back Links are not as important as everyone makes out”
</p></blockquote>
<p>The above statment refers to views such as this:</p>
<ul>
<li>a website cannot be found by Google without a link</li>
<li>a website will not be indexed by Google unless there is a backlink</li>
<li>a website cannot achieve any sort of decent rank without a backlink</li>
</ul>
<p>I had noticed that the necessity of a backlink may no longer be the case and wanted see how far simply &#8216;telling google about the website&#8217; and adding content would get it. Check out the posts leading up to this one as I logged as much as I felt was necessary.</p>
<blockquote><p>what was the competition like when you had #30 page ranks etc?</p></blockquote>
<p>The last time I had checked &#8216;competition&#8217; (only as far as pages that contain the phrase) was 26th January. See <a href="http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/competition-for-manchester-seo/" rel="nofollow">http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/competition-for-manchester-seo/</a><br />
Manchester SEO is not very competitive as a converting term IMO and it&#8217;s very much a vanity rank but when you manually look through the SERPs there are a large number of websites and blogs that are &#8216;optimised&#8217; for the phrase (more than 30 at a guess). </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Appreciate any feedback because my views are content and back links are king.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>If I had to choose I would say content is King purely because I have found that websites can be indexed and appear without backlinks purely based on the content. When it comes to SERP visibility the need for backlinks as an ongoing provision or as a &#8216;starter boost&#8217; may not be necessary for a good many websites with niche markets from sole traders to SMEs and even strong brands. A Google local (ahem sorry <em>Google Places</em> &#8211; why did they change that?)listing and a simple website (with the right content) could be all a business needs to get <em>what they want</em> from that website.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying backlinks are not important, just that there are other factors that come into it and that you don&#8217;t need a backlink for Google to &#8216;find&#8217; and &#8216;index&#8217; a website anymore. Clearly it&#8217;s not something that can be confirmed by doing an analysis today since there are a couple of backlinks present so the reader is encouraged to use what I&#8217;ve recorded as something to consider and explore further themselves. It does require patience though <img src='http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 30 for Manchester SEO with no backlinks by Martin Topping</title>
		<link>http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/top-30-manchester-seo-no-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Topping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manchesterseo.org.uk/?p=108#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Hi good post and worth the read. The only thing that confuses me is that are you saying: 
&quot;Back Links are not as important as everyone makes out?&quot;

Also what was the competition like when you had #30 page ranks etc?

Appreciate any feedback because my views are content and back links are king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi good post and worth the read. The only thing that confuses me is that are you saying:<br />
&#8220;Back Links are not as important as everyone makes out?&#8221;</p>
<p>Also what was the competition like when you had #30 page ranks etc?</p>
<p>Appreciate any feedback because my views are content and back links are king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

